leave a comment

Mammography Update!

This week I’ve come across a few articles and varied blog posts on screening mam­mog­raphy. The impetus for rehashing the topic is a new set of guide­lines issued by the American College of Obste­tri­cians and Gyne­col­o­gists. That group of women’s health providers now advises that most women get annual mam­mo­grams starting at age 40.

Why every year? I have no idea. To the best of my knowledge, there are no data to support that annual mam­mo­grams are cost-​​effective or life-​​saving for women in any age bracket at normal risk for BC.

Per­tinent also, is a recent paper* in the Annals of Internal Med­icine sup­porting a per­son­alized approach to BC screening and mam­mog­raphy for women over the age of 40, and an edi­torial* to go with it.

“Talk to your doctor,” is the point for patients. (Women’s breasts are not all the same.)

“Talk with your patient,” is the point for doctors: Con­sider your patient’s breast density, family health history and per­sonal pref­er­ences. Great idea!

We need an Annals paper to tell us this?

My per­sonal view, syn­the­sizing all the medical lit­er­ature of which I’m aware, and taking account all of my prior expe­ri­ences as a prac­ticing oncol­ogist, and not for­getting I’m a woman, now 50, who had an early-​​stage breast cancer dis­covered by a radi­ol­ogist – and this is not medical advice – is as follows:

For women of normal risk, such as without a strong family history or a prior cancer:

1. Start with a baseline, digital mam­mogram at age 40. The image should be digital first, because this kind of tech­nology is better for visu­al­izing dense breast tissue which is more common in pre-​​menopausal, younger women and second, because digital images can more easily be shared with another doctor, for a second or more expert opinion if necessary.

2. Get mam­mo­grams every other year, unless there’s a sig­nif­icant abnor­mality that requires follow-​​up sooner. Until what age? Hard to say. (A complex topic… hold that thought for another post.)

3. Sup­plement mam­mog­raphy every other year with monthly self-​​examination of the breast. This inex­pensive method of feeling one’s own breasts, reg­u­larly and method­i­cally, has not been shown to save lives in ran­domized clinical trials. But I am con­vinced that if it’s done right — when a gyne­col­ogist, PCP, internist or other care­giver takes the time to teach her patients how to do the breast self-​​exam properly  – as I used to instruct my patients in the clinic, women can help them­selves to catch breast tumors early.

4. Mam­mo­grams should be done, exclu­sively, by appropriately-​​trained radi­ol­o­gists who spend the bulk of their time reading mam­mo­grams, per­forming sono­grams of the breast and taking occa­sional biopsies, as appro­priate. (Sorry, general radi­ol­o­gists, but that’s how it is. Would you want your mother’s breast image examined by a radi­ol­ogist who also reads hip films and MRIs of the brain at the hos­pital where she works?) The rate of false pos­i­tives is lower when mam­mo­grams are per­formed by spe­cialized “breast” radiologists.

5. Take advantage of the fact that mam­mog­raphy centers have been reg­u­lated for nearly two decades by the FDA. Be sure that the place where you get your mam­mogram is MQSA-​​accredited.

All for now -

—-

*sub­scription required for full text

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

  

  

  


*