6 comments, add yours

Why Physicians Shouldn’t Tweet About Their Patients Or O.R. Cases

I fear this post may be a bit of a downer for some e-​​health enthu­siasts, Internet addicts and others who might oth­erwise follow @medicallessons, but after nine months of “studying” med­icine on Twitter, I’ve reached the con­clusion that it’s probably not a good idea for most prac­ticing physi­cians to use 140 char­acter Web-​​broadcasted mes­sages for com­mu­ni­cating with or about their patients.

Sorry if I’m ruining a tweetchat, tweetup or doctors’ virtual party some­where. I just don’t think these belong in the doctor’s office or, espe­cially, in the O.R.

When I signed onto Twitter, I did so pri­marily as a jour­nalist, curious about the pos­sible uses — and potential harms — of this new media platform in med­icine. At first I searched for people to follow with rel­evant interests using terms like “health” and “doctor,” and came upon the usual sus­pects: KevinMD (of course) and a few other bloggers whose sites I knew, but they were, mainly, anonymous or not so – Happy and Doctor Rob, among other excellent examples.

There were and are plenty of fake doctors, too -

I fol­lowed The­Do­ctors for some months, ini­tially uncertain if they were true or make-​​believe. Early on, I found who I thought was Dr. House, the real TV show diag­nos­tician, but soon realized that my source was, instead, a fan club based in Poland. For­tu­nately, today, I was able to suc­cess­fully locate Fox’s DrHouse and have decided to follow him in his network on Twitter, at least for the time being.

Finding plastic sur­geons and der­ma­tol­o­gists was easy, but many seemed too eager if not frankly solic­itous; for some, tweets are inte­grated into a medical mar­keting strategy. Another thing evident was a rel­ative abun­dance of twit­tering ER docs; I give those guys credit, not just for (a few of them) helping maybe to save my life a few times, but as pio­neers among the breakneck firers of health com­mu­ni­cation mis­sives.

For emer­gency health pre­paredness, Twitter makes a lot of sense. Still clearly I recall that 911 morning when the usual com­mu­ni­ca­tions systems crashed. I resorted to using a portable, battery-​​driven radio to hear updates on what was then a rapidly-​​unfolding medical crisis in my city. The same goes for urgent public health alerts and other general, the-​​more-​​people-​​who-​​know-​​about-​​this-​​the better kinds of things like blood drives when a rare type is needed, as I’ve posted pre­vi­ously.

So I’m con­vinced Twitter does have potential and prac­tical, true value in our health care system.

But I don’t get why a regular doctor, sitting at her desk in an office or exam room, or standing in a hos­pital cor­ridor with an iPad in hand, would tweet some­thing about a par­ticular patient. There’s too great a risk of breaching privacy, inad­ver­tently or just stu­pidly, and even it’s been “OK’d” by the patient at the time. On Twitter there’s no taking back some­thing said – it’s out there, period.

That sur­geons or other hos­pital employees would send tweets from an oper­ating room suite seems dan­gerous beyond reason. Last week, health jour­nalist Gary Schwitzer posed this issue as a question on his Health­News­Re­views. Thoughtful quilter and surgeon Dr. R. L. Bates, wove a detailed dis­cussion of the recently-​​tweeted, 18-​​hour double-​​hand trans­plant on her blog, Suture for a Living. This has hap­pened before, and will likely happen again in the future as more hos­pitals decide to post updates about the progress of patients in the O.R., on the Internet in short blurbs.

As a patient who’s been there, under anes­thesia more times than I care to remember, I can’t imagine any­thing much worse than knowing while I’m uncon­scious my doctor might be on-​​line or even just dic­tating tweets instead of con­cen­trating on me, my arteries and veins and spine and wherever I’m bleeding.

Except maybe to think of how my parents might have felt, or my husband and sisters and aunt, as they were so worried in each of those long days while they waited anx­iously for infor­mation. They told me how it went: peri­od­i­cally, a recep­tionist or family-​​room person would come out and tell them how I was doing, and that was never suf­fi­cient. Some­times the doctor, a surgeon, would come out on a break, and that helped. And they’d call my other rel­a­tives, and nowadays I suppose they’d use email or directed texts.

As trying a sit­u­ation as that may be, I can’t help but wonder what happens when and if an oper­ation goes badly, and the text stream sud­denly stops or changes tone. Twitter’s no way to tell a patient’s loved ones that things have taken a turn for the worse…

For­tu­nately I’m here, writing, and I hope this trending practice of O.R. tweets will stop, for good.

Related Posts:

6 comments to Why Physicians Shouldn’t Tweet About Their Patients Or O.R. Cases

  • Excellent, excellent points Elaine.

    I don’t find this post a downer at all — and I’m a huge fan of (intel­ligent & respon­sible) adoption of emerging tech­nologies. Just click the link above to my essay a while ago on using Twitter in healthcare.

    I actually do think Twitter has a lot of value (at least the premise of Twitter — short bursts of infor­mation and a simple fol­lowing rela­tionship). But I also think it opens up the doors to many ethical problems and chal­lenges to not only privacy but also dignity.

    The OR tweets are now passe in my opinion. If used in the right context (and perhaps under a closed platform like Yammer), they can provide curation value to stu­dents, res­i­dents and other faculty who want simple updates on their patients.

    My concern with OR tweets now is that I suspect that some hos­pitals may be doing them to gain some pub­licity (‘look at us, we’re using social media’). At any rate, my hope is that healthcare orga­ni­za­tions ponder the pos­i­tives and neg­a­tives before just jumping into the stream.

    As you raise in your post, the problem with pub­licly tweeting patient info is what happens when things go wrong.

    Or in the case of child­birth — does that need to be tweeted? There’s value in it I suppose — we’re all happy with the arrival of a newborn, and so I can see some value in sharing the joy.

    But I can’t imagine what it would be like in the case of a fetal demise or some other sudden and unex­pected event.

    If I had to sum up my view on Twitter (and other public social media), it’s some­thing like this: we need to explore the true value propo­si­tions of these media in their appro­priate con­texts and weigh them against their costs and risks.

    Right now, we’re in a period of novelty with these tech­nologies. My hope is that we get past the novelty and invest our efforts in fully under­standing the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of emerging media and adopting them in ways that ulti­mately defend, pre­serve and promote human dignity.

    Thanks, Elaine — I’m glad we’re starting to hear ques­tioning voices, because these media aren’t going away.

    @PhilBaumann</a

  • Phil,
    Thanks for such a thoughtful read and your per­spective on this. (Your original post, on 14o health care uses for Twitter — http://​bit​.ly/​9​M​b​7Vv — fac­tored into my decision to join Twitter and learn about its potential.)

    I agree that we need more dis­cussion on this issue, and public attention to the matter, as more doctors, physical ther­a­pists, hos­pitals and other providers use Twitter to spread the good word about their ser­vices, i.e. to advertise. And as I tried to point out, it’s some­times hard to know the source, which can be dan­gerous when it comes to public health and “real value” tweets.

  • I think you raise excellent points. As a tech­nol­ogist and con­sultant that helps clients in the medical field with Social Media/​Tech this is some­thing that I’ve pon­dered as well. I’m going to think of some alter­na­tives and run them past you.

    Society’s current use of Social Media Tech­nology is rel­a­tively new and posts like yours help inspire the foun­dation of DOs and DON’Ts.

    Good Work …
    Cheers,

    @StrategicGen (http://​twitter​.com/​S​t​r​a​t​e​g​i​c​Gen)

  • All very good points Elaine. Ones that cause many of us to worry. Even using a “ded­i­cated” fellow to do the tweeting as the Ken­tucky hand surgery team doesn’t negate the question of “what if some­thing goes wrong.”

    The cir­cu­lating nurse is often asked to “call out” to the family to give updates during surgery. Would family members prefer the call or a text message or a DMs via twitter?

  • Thanks for these thoughts.

    I’m thinking now as a mom: I’d rather get a text from my son about his where­abouts and well-​​being than have no infor­mation at all. In an OR family-​​waiting kind of sit­u­ation, I think in general calls are better then texts, espe­cially in case of bad news. And if texts are sent, out of some strange necessity, I can’t con­ceive of why Twitter would be better than a directed message.

    As for a ded­i­cated fellow who tweets about a case, there’s a real cost: they’d be missing out on learning (cutting, sewing, retracting, sta­pling… ). If they’re not focused on the case, they should be some­where else — outside of the OR — caring for patients, writing notes, doing research or just reading.

  • After the hos­pital bought a new and very expensive piece of sur­gical equipment, it set upon pro­motion. Among the pro­posals: Tweet during surgery. As far as I know, at our place it never happened.

    The con­flict between patient welfare and hos­pital welfare is partly covered in Scalpel…Suction…Tweet. This con­flict carries risk for the patient.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  


*