This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site com­plies with the HONcode standard for trust­worthy health infor­mation:
verify here.

ML Topics

BlogWithIntegrity.com
Please subscribe to ML!
leave a comment

Notes on Wendell Potter, and Why Companies Support the Individual Mandate

The current debate about the indi­vidual mandate reminded me to post this -

About a year ago, I had the oppor­tunity to hear Wendell Potter, author of Deadly Spin - an insider’s sharp cri­tique of the insurance industry, speak at a meeting of the New York Met­ro­politan Chapter of Physi­cians for a National Health Program. Despite the cold, dark winter night and midtown drea­riness of the meeting location, the large lecture room was packed. I arrived well before Potter’s pre­sen­tation but couldn’t get a copy of his book; they’d sold out.

The meeting was instructive: I got a sense of Potter’s per­sonal story (he’s from Ten­nessee, and lived for a while in Appalachia), his pre­vious career (he worked as a jour­nalist, turned to mar­keting, even­tually led PR for Cigna) and his per­spective on how people in the health care industry use lan­guage to frame the debate on health care reform. Since 2009, when he left his position at Cigna, he writes and speaks crit­i­cally about the insurance industry.

Potter made several points that clar­ified my under­standing of the insurance com­panies’ support of the Patient Pro­tection and Affordable Care Act, and why many business-​​minded sorts are adamant about the indi­vidual mandate com­ponent in the law.

Insurance com­panies can’t make a profit without the indi­vidual mandate unless they deny cov­erage to people with pre-​​existing con­di­tions, he explained. ”Think about it,” he said. “If young and healthy people aren’t going to buy insurance, and insurance com­panies can’t refuse to cover those with pre-​​existing con­di­tions, the com­panies would be respon­sible only for pro­viding health care to people who choose insurance, including everyone who is sick.”

“Most Repub­licans who say they favor repeal are disin­genuous in that,” he said. “They’re using a smoke screen tactic to per­suade the public that they’re against the leg­is­lation, but really they support it,” he told. “The insurance com­panies need it to stay in business,” he added.

The new leg­is­lation will also serve most large providers of health care ser­vices. That’s because without reform,  more and more Amer­icans will go without any insurance. “If you keep shifting the costs of health care to con­sumers, they won’t buy it,” he said. And without insurance, most people can’t afford all but the most essential medical ser­vices — if those.

So the indi­vidual mandate assures that the insurance industry can remain prof­itable. And it serves the health care industry by max­i­mizing the number of healthy people who will par­tic­ipate in health care spending.

In other words (ES): The health care industry needs health care to be affordable to many “consumers.”

All for now -
—-

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes