BlogWithIntegrity.com
Please subscribe to ML!
leave a comment

Legitimate Concerns and Unfortunate Timing on Radiation from C.T. Scanning

This week’s cancer news fea­tures a study in the current issue of the Archives of Internal Med­icine, first reported by Reuters:

CHICAGO (Reuters) — Radi­ation from CT scans done in 2007 will cause 29,000 cancers and kill nearly 15,000 Amer­icans, researchers said on Monday:

…The findings, pub­lished in the Archives of Internal Med­icine, add to mounting evi­dence that Amer­icans are over­ex­posed to radi­ation from diag­nostic tests, espe­cially from a spe­cialized kind of X-​​ray called a com­puted tomog­raphy, or CT, scan.

The risks of radi­ation from CT scanning will almost cer­tainly add to the current con­fusion and con­cerns about the risks of breast cancer screening.

Mam­mog­raphy differs from CT scanning in several important ways:

1. Mam­mo­grams involve much less radi­ation exposure than CT scans.

According to the American Cancer Society, a typical mam­mogram uses between 0.1 to 0.2 mSV per image. So even if mul­tiple images are taken of each breast, the total dose remains under 1 mSV.

Another source, the Health Physics Society, esti­mates a dose of 0.7 mSV per mam­mogram. So if a woman were to have a screening mam­mogram every other year between the ages of 40 and 49, she’d receive approx­i­mately 3.5 mSV in total from those procedures.

By con­trast, a single CT scan involves over a 10-​​fold greater amount of radi­ation (such as 8 mSV for a CT of the chest, 10 mSV for a CT of the abdomen) according to the Health Physics Society fact sheet.

2. Mam­mog­raphy is well-​​regulated by the Food and Drug Admin­is­tration (FDA) and other agencies.

The Mam­mog­raphy Quality Stan­dards Act (MQSA) requires mam­mog­raphy facil­ities across the nation to meet uniform quality stan­dards. The law, first passed in October, 1992, requires all mam­mog­raphy facil­ities to 1) be accredited by an FDA-​​approved accred­i­tation body, 2) be cer­tified by FDA, or its State, as meeting the stan­dards, 3) undergo an annual MQSA inspection, and 4) promi­nently display the cer­tificate issued by the agency.

3. Women who undergo screening mam­mo­grams can control when and where they get this pro­cedure.

Screening mam­mo­grams are elective by nature; a woman can choose an accredited screening facility and, in advance, learn some­thing about its rep­u­tation and screening methods. Most women between the ages of 40 and 50 are capable of tracking their mam­mo­grams, whether they choose to have those annually, bien­nially, or less often.

Many CT scans are ordered for patients who are in the hos­pital — a very dif­ferent sort of cir­cum­stance. Many hos­pi­talized patients don’t feel well, don’t under­stand what’s hap­pening to them and/​or lack the needed assertiveness or lan­guage skills to ask about a scan before it’s done.

Summary:

Mam­mog­raphy is a rel­a­tively safe and highly-​​regulated pro­cedure in the U.S.  The recent news on risks from radi­ation in CT scanning should not con­found the dis­cussion of breast cancer screening.

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Get Adobe Flash player