BlogWithIntegrity.com
Please subscribe to ML!
leave a comment

Internet-Based Medical Information May Prove More Trustworthy Than Printed Texts

Today Ed Sil­verman of Phar­malot con­siders the case of a ghost-​​written medical text’s mys­te­rious dis­ap­pearance. The 1999 book, “Recog­nition and Treatment of Psy­chi­atric Dis­orders: A Psy­chophar­ma­cology Handbook for Primary Care,” (reviewed in a psy­chiatry journal here) came under scrutiny last fall when it became evident that the physician “authors” didn’t just receive money from a rel­evant drug maker, SmithKline Beecham; they received an outline and text for the book from phar­ma­ceu­tical company-​​hired writers.

poster for the X-​​Files

The book is no longer evident at the website for STI (Sci­en­tific Ther­a­peutic Infor­mation), the company that pro­vided authorship “help.” I tried to get a copy on Amazon​.com, where it’s said to be tem­porarily out-​​of-​​stock. The work remains listed in the Library of Con­gress on-​​line catalog: #99015420.

I’m reminded of clinical hand­books I used all the time when I was prac­ticing hema­tology and oncology. At the hos­pital, I’d get freebie, small-​​sized chemo regimen primers that con­ve­niently fit into my white coat pocket. In ret­ro­spect, perhaps I didn’t ade­quately check the authors’ cre­den­tials on those mini-​​book sources. It was too easy to take that infor­mation and keep it at hand, lit­erally, espe­cially in the times before we had con­stant Web access.

And I’m struck by how the Internet – that infinite bucket of once-​​lowly or at-​​best mixed-​​quality infor­mation doctors dis­paraged for years – may prove a better infor­mation source than printed books.

It’s a minor paradox, or a twist in trust -

Now, with a few clicks if you know where to look, you can get rec­om­men­da­tions for chemo dosing from reliable sources, like the NIH or peer-​​reviewed journal articles. Although trans­parency about physi­cians’ ties to industry is not nearly yet where it should be, you can find out about more about an author’s con­nec­tions and potential con­flicts of interest than at any time in medical pub­lishing history.

What we write here can’t be dis­carded, burned, or go out of print.

(And it may be cor­rected, readily, before the next edition.)

Related Posts:

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Get Adobe Flash player