No Room For Emotion or Exceptions to the Rule (on Avastin)
My cousin testified before the FDA oncology advisory board on Tuesday about her experience taking Avastin. This is a tragedy, to deny the only drug that is keeping a 51 year old woman alive.
You have to wonder, are the advisory panel members so rational in all their behavior and choices? Are they always so razor-like in their oncology decisions?
These experts have an agenda, here: It’s to be perceived as scientists, even when their knowledge is imperfect and exceptions to the rule stand right in front of their eyes. But clinical medicine calls for flexibility, and tailoring of treatment to each case, and caring about each person, including those who fall at the tail, or in this case better end, of any Kaplan-Meier survival curve.
What would Larry Kramer do about this, I’ve been thinking: He’d scream, really loud, so loud he might break his eardrums. He’d wonder why others, affected and near, aren’t doing the same. And he’d understand why this picture is on page 3 of the business section, and not on the front cover; it’s because people don’t want to look or see or know or think about it too much, because it hurts.
That is the normal heart, and this is a normal response to what’s happening to women with metastatic breast cancer.