2 comments, add yours

Does Cathy Make a Sound Decision in the Big C?

scene from season finale, The Big C

“I don’t want to get sicker trying to get better and then just end up dying anyway” – Cathy, the 42 year old pro­tag­onist with advanced melanoma, on the Big C.

ML’s incoming search data suggest that some people out there are very deter­mined to know exactly what happens to Cathy in Showtime’s new series about a young-​​seeming, middle-​​aged woman with advanced, pre­sumably stage IV, melanoma. In last week’s review I elected not to give it away. Now I’ve recon­sidered. So here’s a spoiler alert: Don’t read this post if you don’t want to know what happens to Cathy at the end of the Big C’s first season.

After months of unusual and comfort zone-​​breaking behavior, Cathy recon­siders her initial decision to forgo treatment. She, pos­sibly influ­enced and clearly sup­ported by her husband’s enthu­siasm for her middle-​​aged life and con­tinued exis­tence, indi­cates that she’s willing and ready to try treatment with Interleukin-​​2. Cathy seems to know some­thing about the FDA-​​approved drug, which is gen­erally toxic and inef­fective in most melanoma cases. At one point, she lists its putative side effects, according to the show: “burning scabs all over my body, con­stantly throwing up, fluid on the lungs, my veins could shut down, I could die on the table…”

Nonetheless she decides to accept treatment:

“I’m gonna hang on as long as I can. And I’m going out ugly,” says Cathy, played by the actress, Laura Linney.

“It will never be hard for me to look at you,” responds her sup­portive husband Paul, por­trayed by the actor Oliver Platt.

At this point Cathy’s hoping the Interleukin-​​2 (“inter­laken,” as her husband keeps calling it, perhaps metaphor­i­cally, sub­con­sciously, or else just simply) will keep her alive for six months, when she might or might not be eli­gible for an exper­i­mental anti-​​melanoma drug in a clinical trial.

So she goes for it: in the final scene she’s in the hos­pital, her mind cloudy, and dreaming. You may wonder what I think of her decision.

As an oncol­ogist I’m half-​​relieved. The patient will, undoubtedly, die too soon – within months or a year or, if she’s lucky, maybe two years or even longer — because you never really know for sure about these things, if she doesn’t take any treatment. Deaths from metastatic cancer can be unpleasant and painful. On the other hand, con­ven­tional therapy for stage IV melanoma rarely leads to com­plete remis­sions and, essen­tially, never cures the disease.

I admired that the patient, until this last episode, main­tained such a no-​​nonsense approach to her con­dition. Her per­spective seemed more mature than her oncologist’s. Despite her weird and nearly unrav­eling behavior, she’s clearer in her pri­or­ities than many patients I’ve known; she seems to under­stand that a treatment might give her a few addi­tional months but is very unlikely to help her get well and, likely, would make her sick for the duration of her life.

Some­times oncol­o­gists get carried away with hope. What I liked best about the story is that she, the patient, was real­istic in this. She didn’t want to take toxic med­ica­tions in des­per­ation, without reason.

As a patient, my feelings are mixed, too. I respected Cathy lack of pas­sivity in her decision. Accepting treatment ini­tially would have been the easier, “normal” thing in our culture. In effect, so far, Cathy’s taken control of what happens to her body. At the same time, I couldn’t help wonder – what if she tried it? Maybe there is a cure in the pipeline, and she’d be eli­gible for an exper­i­mental agent in a few months, and that drug would help her, and she’d live beyond middle age, or at least until she’s 45 or 46.

Today is Monday, but there’s no new Big C episode because the season’s over. We won’t know how Cathy fares with the Interleukin-​​2 for a while. Even though she is just a cable TV char­acter, she’s in a position to teach us about oncology and living with cancer.

Hope­fully the show’s pro­ducers will provide insights into immune treat­ments, tar­geted agents, clinical trials, informed consent and pal­liative care. (I will con­sider Inter­leukin 2 and melanoma in a sep­arate post, to follow.) But given the TV sce­nario, do you think Cathy’s made a sound decision?

—-

Related Posts:

2 comments to Does Cathy Make the Right Cancer Treatment Decision in the Big C?

  • Wow, good question and I wish I had a yes/​no answer. I guess I should lead with a dis­claimer in that I haven’t watched the show (although I’m a huge Laura Linney fan). I guess all I can say about her fic­tional char­acter is what I say about people in real life–she has to make the decision that feels right to her, and no one else can make that choice. I find it believable that someone who had decided to forego treatment for quality of life reasons could change her mind, for whatever reason–perhaps more than once.

    I have no clue what I’d do if I were in her shoes. I like to think I’d vote for quality of life but I hon­estly don’t know. In my limited expe­rience with early stage breast cancer, I know women in my cir­cum­stance who chose radiation/​breast con­serving surgery where I chose a single mas­tectomy, and others who chose a pre­ven­tiave bilateral mas­tectomy. I learned that we have to do what will let us sleep at night and keep us from second guessing ourselves.

    Great dis­cussion topic. Thanks for posting.

  • As I wrote in an essay about my late daughter’s cancer struggle (hepatoma):

    “Post-​​operative ther­a­peutic lit­er­ature on HCC is a dense, frus­trating tangle of mostly con­tra­diction and dis­ap­pointment. Chemo pro­tocols declared “sig­nif­icant” in one study are found inef­fective in another. The patient cohort sample sizes are too small and/​or too unrep­re­sen­tative to gen­er­alize to my daughter’s cir­cum­stance. Worse, the “oper­a­tional def­i­n­ition” of a “success” is usually expressed in terms of weeks’ or months’ life extension beyond that of a control group, with little or no dis­cussion of the quality of life of the therapy recipient. Indeed, beware of the word “pal­liative,” a term nor­mally con­noting “relief of symptoms.” In chemo-​​speak, however, “pal­liative” often simply means staving off expected demise for a short time with pre­cious little oth­erwise “relief” in the bargain.”

    Sissy fought like hell for more than two years, and then decided one day “enough of this shit” when the nurse came in with her chemo shot. She pushed her hand away and said “I’m not doin’ this any more.” Three weeks later she died in my arms.

Leave a Reply