BlogWithIntegrity.com
Please subscribe to ML!
Breast Cancer | cancer screening | Communication | Diagnosis | health care costs | Medical News | Statistics | Women's Health

Stats in the News!

False pos­i­tives have hit the head­lines. Check the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, CNN — they’re every­where. Even the Ladies’ Home Journal skirts the subject.

…Women are ignoring the numbers, choosing reas­surance over hard facts. Some say members of the pro-​​mammogram camp are irra­tional, even addicted…

See more Stats in the News!

Medical News | Statistics

A Note on False Positives

A col­league sent me an email about my math. You’re more or less right, he said, but you need to account for the false positives.

I agree with him. (It’s true.)

The problem is, among others, how to present those numbers in the press.

Sta­tistics don’t sell; still, an expla­nation is due.

In my next full post I’ll con­sider the meaning of false pos­i­tives  — their sig­nif­i­cance and costs -  in the cancer screening debate.

Related Posts:Pro­posed Model for Eval­u­ating False Pos­i­tives in Screening Mam­mog­raphyA Bit More on False Pos­i­tives, Dec 2009, Part 1On Juno and Screening Test StatsStats in the News!A JAMA Press Briefing on CER, Heli­copters and Time for Questions

Communication | Empowered Patient | Life as a Doctor | Life as a Patient | Medical Education | Patient-Doctor Relationship

Dinner with my Family

Family gath­erings cen­tered on two things – food, and talk about med­icine. We spoke of inter­esting cases (always nameless), chal­lenging con­di­tions and, even back then, the con­straints of health care costs. My fiancé, now husband of over 20 years, couldn’t get over how debate over health care dom­i­nated our Rosh Hashanah and Thanks­giving feasts… …when I learned I had breast cancer, I knew exactly what to do. The deci­sions, though dif­ficult, were almost straight­forward, but­tressed by my knowledge and famil­iarity with the lan­guage of medicine…

See more Dinner with my Family

Breast Cancer | cancer screening | Diagnosis | Medical News | Oncology (cancer) | Women's Health

Another Take on Mammography

Three key issues have escaped the head­lines: 1. The expert panel carried out a careful analysis using data that are, nec­es­sarily, old; 2. The rec­om­men­da­tions don’t apply to digital mam­mog­raphy; 3. Mam­mo­grams are not all the same. We need to set the bar higher for mammography…

See more Another Take on Mammography

Breast Cancer | cancer screening | cancer treatment | Diagnosis | health care costs | Medical Ethics | Medical News | Policy | Women's Health

Getting the Math on Mammograms

But con­sider — if the expert panel’s numbers are off just a bit, by as little as one or two more lives saved per 1904 women screened, the insurers could make a profit! By my cal­cu­lation, if one addi­tional woman at a cost of, say, $1 million, is saved among the screening group, the provider might break even. And if three women in the group are saved by the pro­cedure, the decision gets easier… Now, imagine the tech­nology has advanced, ever so slightly, that another four or five women are saved among the screening lot. How could anyone, even with a profit motive, elect not to screen those 2000 women?

See more Getting the Math on Mammograms

cancer survival | Communication | from the author

Hello Readers!

Well, I went ahead and started this blog without a proper intro­duction. Why was I in such a hurry? Because I think the media’s getting — and giving — the wrong message on breast cancer screening. When it comes to long, boring medical pub­li­ca­tions like those pub­lished this week in the Annals of Internal Med­icine, perhaps it’s not the devil that’s in the details so much as are the facts. More on that tomorrow –

See more Hello Readers!

Breast Cancer | cancer screening | Diagnosis | Medical News | Oncology (cancer) | Women's Health

To Screen is Human

Smack in the midst of October-​​is-​​breast-​​cancer-​​awareness-​​month, the Journal of the American Medical Asso­ci­ation pub­lished a provocative article with a low-​​key title: “Rethinking Screening for Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer.” The authors examined trends in screening, diag­nosis and deaths from cancer over two decades, applied the­o­retical models to the data and found a seem­ingly dis­ap­pointing result. It turns out that standard cancer screening is imperfect. The subject matters, espe­cially to me. I’m a medical oncol­ogist and a breast cancer sur­vivor, spared seven years ago from a small, infil­trating ductal car­cinoma by one radi­ol­ogist, an expert physician who noted an abnor­mality on my first screening mammogram…

See more To Screen is Human

Get Adobe Flash player