1 comment, add yours

Talking About Physician Burnout, and Changing the System

With many dif­ficult sit­u­a­tions, the first step in solving a problem is in acknowl­edging it exists. After that, you can under­stand it and, hope­fully, fix it. Our health care system now, as it func­tions in most aca­demic medical centers and dollar-​​strapped hos­pitals, doesn’t give doctors much of a break, or slack, or “joy,” as…

See more Talking About Physician Burnout, and Changing the System

5 comments, add yours

Harsh Words, and Women’s Health at Risk

scarlet-letter-DVDcover

In this new climate of shame, it’s easy to imagine a girl might feel really, really bad about herself simply for being sex­ually active.

See more Harsh Words, and Women’s Health at Risk

leave a comment

Komen Update - Future Plans?

As many ML readers are aware, late this morning, the Susan G. Komen Foun­dation announced it will not cut current grants or funding to Planned Par­enthood. This reversal comes as welcome news to those who support the agency and its work. The New York City branch issued this statement.

Still, many breast cancer advo­cates, activists and others question Komen’s pri­or­ities. This episode draws attention to debate within the BC com­munity about the rel­ative merits of spending charity dollars on screening, edu­cation, awareness, research and other concerns.

The long-​​​​term fallout from this week’s news and the agency’s reversal aren’t known. As I sug­gested earlier, Komen’s lead­ership might take this oppor­tunity to reassess its mission and goals.

—-

Related Posts:A Note on the Komen Fias­coTalking About Physician Burnout, and Changing the Sys­temWhat Does a Bikini Parade Have to Do with Breast Cancer?Harsh Words, and Women’s Health at RiskThe Iron Lady, a Film About an Aging Woman

leave a comment

A Note on the Komen Fiasco

When I first heard the Susan G. Komen Foun­dation is nixing its financial support of Planned Par­enthood, I thought it might be a mistake. Maybe a rogue affiliate or anti-​​​​choice officer had acted inde­pen­dently of the group’s core and mission, and the press got the early story wrong. I waited for Nancy G. Brinker, Komen’s sur­viving sister, to step in and deny the BC agency’s change of plans. That didn’t happen.

Rather, in a stilted video released yes­terday, Brinker defends her agency’s decision as part of a “strategic shift” having to do with funding for any orga­ni­zation under inves­ti­gation. That’s a bogus excuse, as others have detailed.

Komen, the world’s largest BC agency, has been under scrutiny for some time. Through its early fundraising cam­paigns and walks, the group raised public awareness — and dis­cussion — of the disease. Since its inception in 1982, the agency has invested over

See more A Note on the Komen Fiasco

leave a comment

The Iron Lady, a Film About an Aging Woman

Iron Lady Meryl Streep

image, “the Iron Lady”

Over the weekend I saw the Iron Lady, a movie about Mar­garet Thatcher, the former Prime Min­ister of England. I expected a top-​​​​notch, accented and nuanced per­for­mance by Meryl Streep, and got that.

The film sur­prised me in several respects. It’s really about aging, and how a fiercely inde­pendent woman withers. The camera takes you within her elderly, blurry, husband-​​​​conjuring mind. She’s for­getful and ram­bling, but main­tains an interest in current events, and ideas. She looks back on events in her life with pride and, seem­ingly, some regrets.

Well done, worth seeing!

— Adver­tise­ments:

Related Posts:What Underlies the Costs of Demen­ti­aAn­other Take On An Ordinary DayThe “Sur­vivor” Term After Breast Cancer: Is There a Better Expression?Image Share Project (Finally) Enables People to Share and Access Radi­ology Result­sTalking About Physician Burnout, and Changing the

See more The Iron Lady, a Film About an Aging Woman

leave a comment

Visiting the Scar Project Exhibit

On Friday I visited the Scar Project exhibit at Open­house, on Mul­berry Street just south of Spring. Pho­tog­rapher David Jay offers pen­e­trating, large, wall-​​​​mounted images of young people with breast cancer.

The photos reveal women who’ve have had surgery, radi­ation, recon­struction or partial recon­struction of the breasts. Some are strik­ingly beau­tiful. Some appear con­fused, others con­fident. Some look right at you, defiant or maybe proud. Some, post-​​​​mastectomy, adopt frankly or strangely sexual pos­tures. Others hide a breast, or turn away from the lens.

This col­lection is not for everyone. The photos of ravaged bodies of women with cancer might be upsetting, if not frankly dis­turbing, to some who look at them. Not everyone chooses to do so.

The women’s scars and expres­sions are telling. Though not rep­re­sen­tative, these images reflect wounds not often-​​​​shown in medical journals, or elsewhere.

Related Posts:More News On Lymph Nodes and Breast Cancer SurgeryNew NY State Law on Infor­mation for Women Under­going MastectomyDon’t Judge Her! An Essay on Angelina Jolie, BRCA, Cancer Risk and Informed Decision-​​​​MakingStudy Finds Wide Vari­ation in Reop­er­ation Rates after Lumpectomy for Breast CancerA Note on the Komen Fiasco

1 comment, add yours

NEJM Publishes New Review on Breast Cancer Screening

With little fanfare, the NEJM pub­lished a feature on breast cancer screening in its Sept 15 issue. The article, like other “vignettes” in the Journal, opens with a clinical sce­nario. This time, it’s a 42 year old woman who is con­sid­ering first-​​​​time mammography.

The author, Dr. Ellen Warner, an oncol­ogist at the Uni­versity of Toronto, takes oppor­tunity to review updated evi­dence and rec­om­men­da­tions for screening women at average risk for the disease. She out­lines the problem:

Worldwide, breast cancer is now the most common cancer diag­nosed in women and is the leading cause of deaths from cancer among women, with approx­i­mately 1.3 million new cases and an esti­mated 458,000 deaths reported in 2008.(1)

On screening:

The decision to screen either a par­ticular pop­u­lation or a spe­cific patient for a disease involves weighing ben­efits against costs. In the case of breast-​​​​cancer screening, the most important ben­efits are a reduction in the

See more NEJM Pub­lishes New Review on Breast Cancer Screening

2 comments, add yours

Keep it in Focus: One in Seventy

A post in yesterday’s Well column, about cov­erage of breast cancer by the media, focused on the first-​​​​person nar­rative of NBC’s Andrea Mitchell. Jour­nalist Tara Parker-​​​​Pope writes:

Her announcement has gen­erated much dis­cussion in the blo­gos­phere, including an analysis by Gary Schwitzer, pub­lisher of Health​News​Review​.org, who writes that Ms. Mitchell made some mis­steps in dis­cussing her cancer.

The Times column goes on to con­sider what was said, and how it might have been said better, and I agree with much of it. But mainly it’s a meta dis­cussion, jour­nalists talking about how other jour­nalists con­sider breast cancer facts, figures and narratives.

Buried deep is this number, that according to the NCI, one in 69, or for the sake of sim­plicity – approx­i­mately 1 in 70 — women in the U.S. will receive a diag­nosis of BC in her forties. That is an aston­ish­ingly enormous pro­portion of women under 50 years

See more 1 in 70 Women Develops Breast Cancer Before Reaching 50 Years

leave a comment

Should You Tell Your Employer When a Loved One Is Ill?

An article caught my attention in the Sep­tember AARP Bulletin:

The Caregiver’s Dilemma con­siders the 61.6 million people in the U.S. who care for older rel­a­tives or friends. People with jobs are, under­standably, unsure if they should let their boss or super­visor know they’re caring for someone who’s sick. This indirect cost of illness and aging in America is said to tally $33.6 billion each year.

The pressure on workers is tough, writes Sally Abrahms:

Many employees are in that elder care-​​​​giving boat, yet workers with work-​​​​family con­flicts are often reluctant to raise the issue with supe­riors. They fear they’ll be viewed as not com­mitted enough, or receive bad year-​​​​end reviews. They may also think that dis­cussing their per­sonal life is unpro­fes­sional or sense resentment from col­leagues and the boss, who may have to pick up the slack during their absences…

The article reminded me of the dilemma faced by

See more Should You Tell Your Employer When a Loved One Is Ill?

leave a comment

Medical Aspects of 'The Help': The Plight of a Woman with Recurrent Miscarriages

CeliaintheHelp copy (2)

the char­acter Celia, in “The Help”

Last weekend I saw The Help, a movie on race rela­tions in Jackson, Mis­sis­sippi 50 years ago with lin­gering impli­ca­tions for people who hire “help” to take care of their children and tend to their per­sonal business any­where in the world, including now. It’s a heavy-​​​​handed, simple-​​​​message and nonetheless very enjoyable film, with fine acting and imagery, based on the book of the same title by Katherine Stockett.

One element of the nar­rative inter­ested me from the medical per­spective, having to do with the plight of a pale, thin and sexy young woman who’s mar­gin­alized by the white Jackson social elite. The char­acter Celia, por­trayed with flair by Jessica Chastain, lives, iso­lated, on an out-​​​​of-​​​​town plan­tation. She spends her days alone while her husband’s at work. The nom­i­nally proper women in town, while playing bridge and oth­erwise gath­ering, call her “white trash,” and

See more Medical Aspects of ‘The Help’: The Plight of a Woman with Recurrent Miscarriages

13 comments, add yours

Notes on Crazy Sexy Cancer

CrazySexyLife

I’m half-​​​​tempted to put down yesterday’s new NYT Mag­azine feature on crazy sexy cancer goddess Kris Carr. Her blog was one of the first I found when I started ML, and it was the most popular link on my fledgling site until I pulled it, fearful of somehow spon­soring a too-​​​​alternative oncology perspective.

But I give Carr credit, sin­cerely: Crazy Sexy Cancer is a lot more appealing a title than, say, Medical Lessons. I’d read CSC, for sure, if I had a new diag­nosis or, maybe, if I were alone and bored or suf­fering from a con­dition like chronic fatigue syn­drome or insomnia and hadn’t gone to med school. Even for people who really have cancer, letting loose and being attractive sounds, well, like a lot of fun.

Kris Carr has played her C-​​​​card like a Queen of Dia­monds. You go, girl!

So

See more Notes on Kris Carr and Crazy Sexy Cancer

1 comment, add yours

Flashfree Moves to a New Site

soybean (USDA image, WC)

Flashfree, a super-​​​​hip blog on menopause and women’s health, has a new home on the Web. Health writer Liz Scherer started the blog in May, 2008, upon searching far and wide for straight talk on midlife women’s health issues.

soybean (USDA image, WC)

I found Flashfree early on in my explo­ration of on-​​​​line health sites. Liz is sharp and serious, curious, current and funny. What I most appre­ciate is that she rou­tinely sup­ports her reports with links to rel­evant medical journals.

Today’s post is on soy; a new study in the Archives of Internal Med­icine con­firms that the pro­teina­ceous stuff neither relieves hot flashes nor pre­vents bone thinning in women.

Good luck to Liz in her new spot!

I’ll be following -

—-

Related Posts:Talking About Physician Burnout, and Changing the Sys­temHarsh Words, and Women’s Health at RiskWeds Web Shoutout: A Cardiologist’s Blog on Heart Health, Doc­toring and FitnessKomen

See more Wednesday Web and Shoutout: Flashfree Moves to a New Site

leave a comment

Good People, a New Play About Chance, Decisions and Fate

Frances McDormand - MTC

A short note on Good People, the title of a new play at the Man­hattan Theatre Club starring Frances McDormand –

It’s a simple story, at some level, about a middle-​​​​aged woman from south Boston who loses her job. She has a dis­abled, adult daughter who needs care­giving, and she needs money. She con­tacts some old friends, and scours the neigh­borhood for a job. She encounters a once-​​​​boyfriend, just for a summer at the end of her childhood, who’s become a doctor with a fancy office and a fancy house and a beau­tiful wife.

Frances McDorman, in a photo for the MTC

And she’s angry, angry because she’s never been able to leave her com­munity despite, as she puts it, “being nice.” She put her daughter’s needs first and helped others when she could – or so she says, but she was too often late for work at one

See more Good People, a New Play About Chance, Deci­sions and Fate

leave a comment

Confusing Reports On Coffee and Cancer, and What To Do About Breakfast

cup of coffee - WC

When I was a medical res­ident in the late 1980s, we treated some patients with pan­creatic cancer on a regimen nick-​​​​named the coffee pro­tocol because it included infu­sions of intra­venous caf­feine. How absurd, we thought back then, because years earlier caf­feine had been linked to pan­creatic cancer as a pos­sible cause.

Now, two new studies suggest that coffee con­sumption reduces a woman’s risk for devel­oping breast cancer, according to MedPage Today:

Women who drank at least five cups of coffee daily had a sig­nif­i­cantly lower risk of post­menopausal breast cancer, an analysis of two large cohort studies suggested.

…Coffee has a para­doxical rela­tionship with breast cancer risk. The beverage’s complex mix of caf­feine and polyphenols sug­gests a potential to confer both car­cino­genic and chemo­pre­ventive char­ac­ter­istics, the authors noted…

I’m incred­ulous, still.

As with most com­pounds we ingest or oth­erwise absorb, it’s con­ceivable that caf­feine could damage some cells or somehow

See more Con­fusing Reports On Coffee and Cancer, and What To Do About Breakfast

leave a comment

Some Local Mammography News and Opinion:

A recent audit of nine NYC’s Health and Hos­pitals Cor­po­ration found City Comp­troller Liu described as dan­gerous delays in women’s health care. It takes too long for women to get screening and diag­nostic mammograms.

The 2009 audit found women at Elmhurst Hos­pital had the longest waits – 50 working days (that would be 10 weeks, i.e. 2.5 months) for diag­nostic mam­mo­grams, on average. You can find more details here.

According to the Times’ coverage:

Ana Marengo, a spokes­woman for the city’s Health and Hos­pitals Cor­po­ration, which runs the public health system, said that the comptroller’s data was outdated…

At Elmhurst, she said, the wait as of December 2010 was 20 days for screening and 23 days for a general diag­nostic test, as opposed to an urgent one.

Still, at Queens Hos­pital Center, the wait for a screening test was 56 days in December <2010>, Ms. Marengo said. “It’s due to

See more New York City Reports Long Delays for Mammograms

leave a comment

Noting Depression in Susan Glaspell's 1917 Story: A Jury of Her Peers

Susan Glaspell

Recently I read the short story, A Jury of Her Peers by Susan Glaspell, with a group of women in my com­munity. The author, with whom I wasn’t pre­vi­ously familiar, first reported on the real 1901 trial of Mar­garet Hossack, as a jour­nalist writing for the Des Moines Daily News. Later she adapted the story as a one-​​​​act drama, Trifles, and then in 1917 as a short nar­rative pub­lished in Everyweek, a long-​​​​defunct mag­azine of the Crowell Pub­lishing Company.

Original per­for­mance of “Trifles,” (from the Billy Rose Theatre Col­lection, New York Public Library at Lincoln Center)

There’s a lot you might take from this swift, rich read. It goes like this: A man and his son came upon a couple’s house in rural area. The man’s been killed, clearly; his wife sits in a chair, oddly, and can’t say what hap­pened to her husband. The local author­ities and a

See more Noting Depression in Susan Glaspell’s 1917 Story: A Jury of Her Peers

2 comments, add yours

New Study, Presented at a Meeting of Breast Surgeons, Supports that Mammograms Save Lives of Women in Their 40s

The American Society of Breast Sur­geons held its 2011 annual meeting in D.C. from April 27 – May 1. Among the papers pre­sented was Abstract #1754: “Mam­mog­raphy in 40 Year Old Women: The Potential Impact of the U.S. Pre­ven­tative Ser­vices Task Force (USPSTF) Mam­mog­raphy Guide­lines.” You can find the press release, fol­lowed by the abstract, here. The main result was that screening women ages 40–49 by mam­mog­raphy was asso­ciated with finding smaller tumors, with less spread to the lymph nodes, than clinical breast exams alone, and this cor­re­lates with improved sur­vival at 5 years.

The study, put forth by a group at the Uni­versity of Missouri-​​​​Columbia in Columbia, MO, is based on a 10-​​​​year ret­ro­spective chart review, from 1998 – 2008, of 1581 women treated for breast cancer at that insti­tution. In this author’s opinion, a ret­ro­spective, chart-​​​​review type analysis of a medical inter­vention is about as low as you

See more New Study, Pre­sented at a Meeting of Breast Sur­geons, Sup­ports that Mam­mo­grams Save Lives of Women in Their 40s

leave a comment

Portrait of a Peculiar Relationship at the End of Life

Darren Pettie and Olympia Dukakis

Last weekend I went to see a strange, slightly unnerving play, The Milk Train Doesn’t Stop Here Anymore by Ten­nessee Williams. It’s a sad take on the end of life, and des­per­ation in some lonely characters.

Olympia Dukakis plays an aging, vain, older woman who’s dying of an unnamed con­dition. She takes mor­phine injec­tions help her “neu­ralgia,” and uses liquor to entertain guests and, without success, to blunt her emo­tional pain. A handsome young man, pre­senting himself as a poet and sculptor of mobiles, climbs up the hill on which rests her Italian villa.

She’s no fool and quickly learns of his moniker, “the angel of death.” It’s said he has a par­ticular fondness for ter­minal, moneyed women. Still he is impov­er­ished; he shows up essen­tially starving and with nearly nothing in his sack; he has not exactly ben­e­fited from his exploits.

Darren Pettie and Olympia Dukakis

Dying alone

See more Por­trait of a Peculiar Rela­tionship at the End of Life

leave a comment

Breast Cancer Rate in the U.S. is No Longer Declining

A wor­risome report on breast cancer trends in the U.S. appeared on-​​​​line today, ahead of print in an AACR journal, Cancer Epi­demi­ology, Bio­markers & Prevention.

The analysis, based on the NCI’s SEER data from 2000 — 2007, shows that the inci­dence of breast cancer in the U.S. is no longer declining. (A drop after 2002 in BC inci­dence is gen­erally attributed to an abrupt reduction in HRT around that time.)

Since 2003 the overall BC rate has been steady overall, with a few exceptions:

The inci­dence of BC in non-​​​​Hispanic white women ages 60–69 rose by 4.8% in this period. “It remains to be seen if this trend will con­tinue,” according to the study authors.

Among white women ages 40–49 rates of estrogen receptor (ER) pos­itive (ER+) breast cancer sig­nif­i­cantly increased by an average of 2.7% per year during this period. In con­trast, the rate of ER– breast tumors decreased,

See more Breast Cancer Rate in the U.S. is No Longer Declining

6 comments, add yours

Radiologists' Experience Matters in Mammography Outcomes

There’s a new study out on mam­mog­raphy with important impli­ca­tions for breast cancer screening. The main result is that when radi­ol­o­gists review more mam­mo­grams per year, the rate of false pos­i­tives declines.

The stated purpose of the research,* pub­lished in the journal Radi­ology, was to see how radi­ol­o­gists’ inter­pretive volume – essen­tially the number of mam­mo­grams read per year – affects their per­for­mance in breast cancer screening. The inves­ti­gators col­lected data from six reg­istries par­tic­i­pating in the NCI’s Breast Cancer Sur­veil­lance Con­sortium, involving 120 radi­ol­o­gists who inter­preted 783,965 screening mam­mo­grams from 2002 to 2006. So it was a big study, at least in terms of the number of images and out­comes assessed.

First — and before reaching any con­clu­sions — the variance among sea­soned radi­ol­o­gists’ everyday expe­rience reading mam­mo­grams is striking. From the paper:

…We studied 120 radi­ol­o­gists with a median age of 54 years (range, 37–74 years); most worked

See more Radi­ol­o­gists’ Expe­rience Matters in Mam­mog­raphy Outcomes